HCM 213 Saudi Electronic University Financial Management for Healthcare Questions

SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

HC 450 Herzing University W4 EHR Migration Path For A Rural Hospital Research

HC 450 Herzing University W4 EHR Migration Path For A Rural Hospital Research
Unit 4 Assignment – Migration PathsSubmit AssignmentDue Aug 2 by 11:59pm Points 40 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructionsFigures 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6 and 6.7 in the Amatayakul textbook all show the migration path towards an EHR using different formats, e.g. picture, building block, step diagram, flow chart, etc. Assess the migration path formats and evaluate the similarities and differences.Develop an EHR migration path of a type of your choice for a small, 49-bed, rural hospital. The hospital has no skilled nursing homes, nor is it associated with any physician clinics.Develop a summary of your evaluation and reasoning for the chosen format.Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.Cite all sources in APA format.Submit your EHR migration path and summary for grading.Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.RubricUnit 4 Assignment – Migration PathsUnit 4 Assignment – Migration PathsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of KnowledgePRICE-P10.0 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.9.0 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.7.0 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.6.0 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research5.0 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.4.5 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.4.0 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.3.5 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.3.0 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes5.0 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.4.5 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.4.0 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.3.5 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).3.0 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNextSubmission Not Submitted!Submission Details(40 pts possible)Graded Anonymously: noComments:No Comments

Purdue University Nursing Learning Discussion

Purdue University Nursing Learning Discussion
Reflecting on what you have learned about the social determinants of health, SDOH, how can nurses work collaboratively with physicians and other health care professionals to improve primary care, reduce overutilization and improve underutilization of healthcare services? Include in your response how fostering an environment of diversity and cultural awareness among healthcare providers builds a stronger healthcare team and improves care delivery to healthcare consumers.

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

error: Content is protected !!