(Mt) – MGT 510 Saudi Electronic Corporate Strategy and Diversification of Google

SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Unformatted Preview
SEU_MGT510 Critical Thinking Assignment Rubric – Module 12 Exceeds Expectation Content, Research, and Analysis 25-30 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 29-35 Points Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the assignment with no errors or major omissions. 29-35 Points Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications for strategic recommendations. 5 Points Sources Sources go above and beyond required criteria and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Mechanics and Writing 9-10 Points Demonstrates Project is clearly college-level organized, well proficiency in written, and in organization, proper format as grammar and outlined in the style. assignment. Demonstrates strong sentence and paragraph Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence 19-24 Points Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 22-28 Points Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the assignment; may include some minor errors or omissions. 22-28 Points Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications for strategic recommendations. 4 Points Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 13-18 Points Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 14-21 Points Demonstrates fair knowledge of the assignment and/or includes some major errors or omissions. 14-21 Points Provides poor though, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications for strategic recommendations. 3 Points Sources meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 7-12 Points Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6-13 Points Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the assignment and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 6-13 Points Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications for strategic recommendations. 1-2 Points Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 7-8 Points Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Demonstrates reasonably good sentence and 5-6 Points Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Demonstrates inconsistent to inadequate 3-4 Points Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Demonstrates poor quality work and is unacceptable in SEU_MGT510 Critical Thinking Assignment Rubric – Module 12 structure, contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Total points possible = 115 paragraph structure, may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style or APA citations and references. terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

error: Content is protected !!