Prinsess Nora Peer Review of Critical Analysis Paper

SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Unformatted Preview
Assessment Task 5 – Critical Analysis Due Date: Due 23:00 Thursday 14th April 2022 (Week 12) You will critically analyse a current professional issue in the form of a 2,000 word ‘viewpoint’ article. In addition, you will provide some evidence of your search strategy (500 of the total 2,000 words). The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal suggests: “Viewpoints provide a forum for the debate and discussion of occupational therapy issues and related concerns. The discussion should highlight the author’s opinion and the views presented should be linked, where possible, with an established literature base. Authors are encouraged to discuss topical and controversial issues, and to do so in a manner that sheds light on or challenges established practices and beliefs. In many cases, discussion will require attention to varying opinions”. Brief description of the task: Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)14401630/homepage/ForAuthors.html You can work on this task individually or with a peer. You are encouraged to draw on personal communication with occupational therapists and others as well as being expected to refer to professional newsletters, textbooks and research publications. Some potential topics include: The reality of being an evidence-based practitioner Effective supervision and mentoring from the student’s perspective Promoting community awareness of occupational therapy Interdisciplinary education and practice Graduate support needs Working in rural settings You are encouraged to use an active voice when writing the critical analysis. Phrases such as ‘we argue’ or ‘in our opinion’, are acceptable AFTER the appropriate argument has been built and 29 OCC421 Transition to Practice described. Word limit: 2,000 words. Weighting: 45% of final grade. Written assignment. Presentation Words above or below the word count will cause 5 marks requirements: deduction. Any collusion or plagiarism will equal zero as per guidelines Estimated return date: Marking Criteria: Two weeks from the date of submission. See sheet attached. 30 OCC421 Transition to Practice OCC421 AT5 Marking Criteria: Critical Policy Analysis Assignment Name: …………………………………………………………………………………………. CATEGORY Introduction: Description of the issue with relevance to occupational therapy (two-three paragraphs) Clearly identifies what the critical analysis will cover (professional, practice or theoretical issue) (10 marks) Argument presented: Identifies and presents various viewpoints relating to the issue, supported by evidence. (10 marks) Authors’ perspective: Clear identification of authors’ view with discussion of own opinion Transition leading towards OCC421 to Practice a clear conclusion Topic: ……………………………………………………………… A (9-10 marks) B (8-8.9 marks) C (7-7.9 marks) D (6-6.9 marks) Provides a clear description/background to a relevant issue. The question to be addressed is apparent by the end of the introduction. Clearly outlines the main points to be discussed. Provides a strong link with OT practice (relevance) that is clearly backed up by at least three quality research articles. Provides sufficient background to a relevant issue. The question to be addressed is introduced, but could be more specific. The reader is left with a clear overview of what will be discussed. A link is apparent between the issue and OT practice, and information is supported by at least three research articles. Provides various perspectives of the issue but is not clear and misses one-two points. Most of the evidence and examples are relevant with key themes identified. Explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the issue (at least six reliable references). Provides some background of an issue. The question to be addressed is introduced, needs more clarity. Provides a link to OT practice that is partially backed up by at least two quality research articles. Outlines some background but does not clearly identify a relevant issue. A general issue is identified, but its relevance to OT practice is not made clear. Introduction provides too little or too much information to give an overview of the topic. Only one research article is cited. Provides some perspectives but misses many points. At least one of the pieces of evidence and examples is relevant with key themes identified. Explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the issue (at least four reliable references). Provides a reasonably clear statement of the author’s position on the topic. Provides a reasonably sound argument comparing and contrasting views from Provides a statement of the author’s position on the topic. Provides an argument comparing and contrasting views from Clearly provides various perspectives of the issue. All of the evidence and examples are relevant. Each piece of evidence clearly relates to the topic, building to create a coherent picture of the issue as viewed from different sides. Key themes are identified. Explanations relate each piece of evidence to the topic (at least eight reliable references). Provides a clear, strong statement of the author’s position on the topic. Provides a well-reasoned and sound argument comparing and contrasting Provides some perspectives of the issue but misses two or more points. At least two of the pieces of evidence and examples are relevant with key themes identified. Explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the issue (at least five reliable references). Provides a weak statement of the author’s position on the topic. Provides a weak argument comparing and contrasting views from F- needs more work

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

error: Content is protected !!